Roseville High School

Board decision generating substantial community conflict

Roseville, CA- The RJUHSD board of trustees voted to approve the venue change at last Tuesday’s board meeting.

The last week of May, the district plans to hold two graduations on the Thursday and three on the final Friday, though the exact order and times are to be determined. Moving to the event center guarantees attendees air-conditioning and weather protection, as well as more parking and seating than was previously available at each individual campus. Guests will also be able to see graduating students on a live video feed of the stage playing on screens around the venue.

“I don’t think the board is properly voicing the students’ voice…”

Mady Nickerson, Senior class vice president

According to RJUHSD superintendent Denise Herrmann, the ticket increase will vary by school and will be determined in the forthcoming weeks. Roseville High School principal Nicholas Richter said at RHS, it could mean each student gets approximately two additional tickets.

At the board meeting, four RJUHSD students spoke against approving the change; all three student representatives for the board also disapproved, speaking for the schools’ traditions and the students’ emotional connection to the campus. The board approved the change in a 3-2 vote.

In response to the board’s decision, RHS junior and student government press commissioner Nick Dominguez started a petition to move graduation back to schools’ respective campuses. It currently has over 2,500 signatures. RHS students are also planning a walkout during the ROAR educational support period today. Students plan to leave their classrooms and sit on the tiger paw on Hansen field, where seniors used to graduate before the change.

Senior class vice president Mady Nickerson spoke at the board meeting against moving graduation and is working to spread the word of the petition.

“I don’t think the board is properly voicing the students’ voice, which is what they need to do,” Nickerson said. “We have spoken out for this long about it that they need to realize that we don’t want to back down. We want to keep graduation at our home.”

According to Nickerson, RHS principal Nicholas Richter also offered to read any letters students write about moving graduation to the school board.

Board member Scott Huber put forward the motion to approve the change, suggesting the district approach the issue from a “liability” and “accessibility” standpoint. According to Huber, at least one person has collapsed from heat stroke or dehydration during graduation every year for the last several years. Huber said moving graduation to an air-conditioned, climate-controlled facility would make it safer and easier for guests with disabilities or health conditions to attend.

“I wasn’t elected to make popular decisions,” Huber said at the board meeting. “I was elected to make hard decisions… I’m surprised we haven’t been sued a number of times over this. When was the last time an ambulance wasn’t used at one of these graduations for heat stroke?”

Each school site pays for its own graduation expenses through money in the school budget, which can cost around $15,000 to $25,000, according to Herrmann. Assistant superintendent of business services Joe Landon said the district will pay for the Placer Valley Event Center, meaning each school can use the money usually spent on graduation elsewhere. In holding all five graduations at one venue, the district expects to save around $50,000.

In August, the district emailed students, staff and parents a survey for their input on moving graduation. The majority of parents and staff who filled out the survey responded favorably. Students’ responses were more divided – just over half of the students said they wanted to stay on their school’s campus. However, only 4% of RJUHSD students responded to the survey.

Board member Andrew Tagg voted against moving the graduation this school year, in part due to the low student input. He suggested waiting and reserving the event center for next year to allow this year’s seniors who expected to graduate on campus, while giving juniors and underclassmen time to acclimate to the change. This course of action would have also allowed the district time to work through the details of graduation at this new venue.

“There was still a lot of unanswered questions on logistics – plus doing it a month into the new school year I thought was unfair for seniors,” Tagg said. “I would rather take a little more time ironing out some of those details… I just thought there was not really a need to rush this through.”

According to Landon, the district is currently working with Placer Valley Tourism to negotiate a multi-year agreement. They must circumvent the pre-established schedules of each school site to determine the order for the five schools’ graduations. A team that includes principals and assistant principals from each site is working to plan graduation at the new venue.

Students can continue to hold certain fundraisers at the event center, though options are more limited as the fundraisers should not overlap with services, such as selling water, that are already provided by the venue, according to Landon. However, he is currently working with the center to discuss the possibility of some of the proceeds from the center’s services going toward the schools.

Although the outcome didn’t go their way, Huber is proud of the students for speaking up.
“I am very proud of every one of those students. They were taking part in what makes this country great and what makes our government run, which is listening to the voices of the people,” Huber said. “The fact that this didn’t go the way that they were hoping doesn’t mean that we aren’t listening to them. We are listening to them and their opinions are important to us.”

According to Herrmann, regardless of the change, certain school-wide “traditions” – like holding choir or band performances – could be carried on in the indoor facility – and, the technology at the new facility could offer the opportunity to try something new.

“We are thinking ‘Here’s what we’ve done in the past. Here’s how all of those things would fit in this space.’ And then also brainstorming some new ideas,” Herrmann said. “[In the event center] there are some other opportunities that we haven’t had before… I want those new ideas to be things that students feel would be making the ceremony as personable as possible.”

  • reprinted with permission